Taxi to the Darkside

Issue section: 
Issue: 
(326)

Director: Alex Gibney; Release date: 13 June

No one person murdered Dilawar, a 22 year old Afghan taxi driver, abducted, imprisoned and finally killed at Bagram air base in December 2002. Rather Dilawar died as the result of a sustained programme of torture visited upon him on the orders of the US government.

In Taxi To The Dark Side director Alex Gibney probes meticulously the decision making, chain of command, and documentation that sanctioned the use of torture in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay (the latter's gift shop featuring in one segment).

Gibney shows how the brutal interrogation techniques used by the US military were authorised directly from key government figures Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, and were then cascaded through the entire chain of command, resulting in the human rights abuses recorded at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.

Using a similar format adopted in his exposé of the Enron corporation, The Smartest Guys In The Room, Gibney works with a broad range of interviews from high ranking military lawyers, FBI officials and ordinary soldiers, to build up a detailed picture of the logic driving the US torture machine.

Arrested by a US backed militia and accused of being involved in a mortar attack on a US base, Dilawar was detained at Bagram air base. There he was subjected to a range of brutal treatments which left his legs literally beaten to a pulp. Forced to endure long hours shackled to a ceiling and forced to stand, Dilawar's body finally gave up.

He had been one of the 90 percent of US-held prisoners who were bought from local militias - the occupiers having in effect created a market for "terrorists". Several of the guards responsible for beating Dilawar were tried and convicted, and as they present themselves in the film it becomes clear that they were the fall guys under intense pressure to get results. Their commanders were subsequently promoted, the politicians escaping untouched.

If there were one criticism of this revealing film it is that in concentrating on the impact of these policies on US society, it hears only fleetingly from the victims of the terror and their families, and thus misses an opportunity to return to them the humanity, dignity and sense of justice of which they have been robbed.